4.7 Article

Microfluidic in-line dynamic light scattering with a commercial fibre optic system

期刊

LAB ON A CHIP
卷 23, 期 11, 页码 2540-2552

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3lc00062a

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the coupling of dynamic light scattering (DLS) in microfluidics using a contact-free fibre-optic system for under-flow characterization of various solutions, dispersions, and structured fluids. The system was validated and evaluated with different model systems and the analysis method was examined as a function of flow velocity. We demonstrated the continuous flow measurement of a binary surfactant/salt solution with varying micellar dimensions within a few minutes.
We report the coupling of dynamic light scattering (DLS) in microfluidics, using a contact-free fibre-optic system, enabling the under-flow characterisation of a range of solutions, dispersions, and structured fluids. The system is evaluated and validated with model systems, specifically micellar and (dilute) polymer solutions, and colloidal dispersions of different radii (similar to 1-100 nm). A systematic method of flow-DLS analysis is examined as a function of flow velocity (0-16 cm s(-1)), and considerations of the relative contribution of 'transit' and 'Brownian' terms enable the identification of regions where (i) a quiescent approximation suffices, (ii) the flow-DLS framework holds, as well as (iii) where deviations are found, until eventually (iv) the convection dominates. We investigate practically relevant, robust setups, namely that of a capillary connected to microdevice, as well as direct measurement on a glass microdevice, examining the role of capillary dimensions and challenges of optical alignment. We conclude with a demonstration of a continuous flow measurement of a binary surfactant/salt solution, whose micellar dimensions vary with composition, characterised with hundreds of data points (every similar to 5 s) and adequate statistics, within a few minutes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据