4.5 Review

Multifunctional conductive hyaluronic acid hydrogels for wound care and skin regeneration

期刊

BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 11, 期 7, 页码 2266-2276

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2bm02057b

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents the latest research on conductive and interactive hydrogels based on hyaluronic acid (HA) as wound dressings, which promote skin tissue regeneration through electrical stimulation and multifunctional performance. The selection of systems emphasizes recent works that demonstrate enhanced scalability and biomimicry. The article also discusses the challenges and translational impact of these systems on commercial and clinical applications.
Although the main function of skin is to act as a protective barrier against external factors, it is indeed an extremely vulnerable tissue. Skincare, regardless of the wound type, requires effective treatments to prevent bacterial infection and local inflammation. The complex biological roles displayed by hyaluronic acid (HA) during the wound healing process have made this multifaceted polysaccharide an alternative biomaterial to prepare wound dressings. Therefore, herein, we present the most advanced research undertaken to engineer conductive and interactive hydrogels based on HA as wound dressings that enhance skin tissue regeneration either through electrical stimulation (ES) or by displaying multifunctional performance. First, we briefly introduce to the reader the effect of ES on promoting wound healing and why HA has become a vogue as a wound healing agent. Then, a selection of systems, chosen according to their multifunctional relevance, is presented. Special care has been taken to highlight those recently reported works (mainly from the last 3 years) with enhanced scalability and biomimicry. By doing that, we have turned a critical eye on the field considering what major challenges must be overcome for these systems to have real commercial, clinical, or other translational impact.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据