4.7 Article

Devising strategies for sustainable development in sub-Saharan Africa: The roles of renewable, non-renewable energy, and natural resources

期刊

ENERGY
卷 284, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.128713

关键词

Sub-Saharan Africa; Sustainable development; Renewable; Fossil fuel; Democracy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Sub-Saharan African countries are facing challenges in achieving sustainable development due to the mismatch between energy and climate policies and human development aspects. This study aims to fill this policy gap by integrating human development aspects into the energy and climate policies of these countries. The analysis of renewable and non-renewable energy, as well as natural resources, reveals that renewable energy and natural resources have a positive but insignificant impact on sustainable development, while fossil fuel significantly and negatively affects it.
The Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries are encountering difficulties in attaining sustainable development because of the non-alignment of the energy and climate policies with the human development aspects. The present study attempts to address this policy void by mainstreaming the human development aspects in the energy and climate policies of the SSA countries. In this pursuit, the impact of renewable, non-renewable energy and natural resources on sustainable development index is analyzed for 28 sub-Sahara African countries over 1990-2019. Presence of cross-sectional dependence is controlled through the application of Augmented Mean Group (AMG) and Common Correlated Effects Mean Group (CCEMG) estimation. The results reveal that renewable energy and natural resources have positive but insignificant impacts on sustainable development, while fossil fuel significantly and negatively affects sustainable development. The study outcomes are used to develop policy recommendations for the achievement of sustainable development in the SSA countries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据