4.0 Article

Morphophysiology and gas exchange of pomegranate under salt stress and foliar application of nitrogen

期刊

出版社

UNIV FEDERAL CAMPINA GRANDE
DOI: 10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v27n12p958-965

关键词

Punica granatum L.; photosynthesis; nitrogen; salinity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of foliar nitrogen fertilization on pomegranate seedlings irrigated with brackish water. The results showed that salinity negatively affects the gas exchange of pomegranate seedlings, while foliar nitrogen fertilization at 1.31 g L-1 improves plant height and leaf number, and at 1.59 g L-1 increases net photosynthesis.
Salinity is one of the abiotic stresses that affect gas exchange and growth of pomegranate. In this context, the application of nitrogen fertilizer through the leaves can minimize these effects. Thus, the objective of present study was to evaluate the effect of foliar nitrogen fertilization on pomegranate seedlings irrigated with brackish water. The design used was randomized blocks, in an incomplete factorial scheme (Central Composite Design) with five electrical conductivities of irrigation water -ECw (0.50, 1.15, 2.75, 4.35, and 5.00 dS m-1) and five doses of foliar nitrogen fertilization -FNF (0, 0.33, 1.15, 1.97, and 2.30 g L-1), with four replicates and two plants per experimental plot. Plant height, number of leaves, stem diameter, and gas exchange (stomatal conductance, net photosynthesis, intercellular CO2 concentration, transpiration rate, instantaneous carboxylation efficiency, instantaneous water use efficiency, and intrinsic water use efficiency) were evaluated at 60 days after the beginning of irrigation with saline water. Salinity of irrigation water negatively affects the gas exchange of pomegranate seedlings. Foliar nitrogen fertilization up to 1.31 g L-1 improves plant height and number of leaves in pomegranate seedlings under salt stress. Foliar nitrogen fertilization up to 1.59 g L-1 increases the net photosynthesis of pomegranate seedlings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据