4.7 Article

Synthesis, Structure, Morphology, Element composition, Electrochemical, and Optical studies of Zn0.98-XMn0.02CeX Quantum dots

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2023.123140

关键词

ZnS; HR-TEM; Cyclic voltammetry; Band gap; Rare earth; Photoluminescence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reports the preparation of Mn-doped ZnS and Mn, Ce co-doped ZnS quantum dots using a facile co-precipitation technique. The synthesized particles were confirmed to have a cubic structure and a particle size of -2 nm through XRD and HR-TEM results. The optical characteristics of the samples were revealed through UV-visible absorbance and transmittance spectra.
Quantum dots (QDs) are semiconductors whose size falls in a range between 1 and 10 nm; they are generally known as zero-dimension materials. It finds various applications in optical industries including light-emitting diodes, display technology, imaging, and labelling. ZnS is one of the excellent QDs in its class of II-VI semiconductors. In this paper, It is reported that the preparation of Mn-doped ZnS and Mn, Ce co-doped ZnS QDs using facile co-precipitation technique. XRD and HR-TEM results confirmed the cubic structure, particle size, and phase of the synthesized particles, and the crystallite is measured as -2 nm. The surface morphology, elemental analysis, and FT-IR spectra revealed the purity of the samples and confirmed the presence of dopants as expected. Cyclic voltammetry studies expressed the electrochemical behaviour of the samples, which increased as a function of Ce3+ doping concentration. UV-visible absorbance and transmittance spectra disclosed the optical characteristics of the samples. A wide band gap (4.02 eV) was received for 2% Ce-doped Zn: MnS QDs. Week Blue and strong yellow emissions were received for 4% Ce-doped Zn:MnS QDs. Whereas, high intensity red-emission was received for 2% Ce-doped Zn:MnS QDs. The different colour emissions are discussed in terms of defects produced.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据