3.8 Proceedings Paper

Qualification of the MMX Rover Locomotion Subsystem for the Martian Moon Phobos

期刊

2023 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/AERO55745.2023.10115865

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The German Aerospace Center (DLR) has developed a wheeled rover for Phobos, the moon of Mars, which has a very low gravity. This is the first time that wheeled locomotion has been tested in such a low gravity environment. The results of this experiment are important for future missions and the development of driving gears for low gravity environments.
Planetary rovers have proven their function and value for the Earth moon as well as Mars in the past decades. While these celestial bodies have a gravity of the same order of magnitude as the Earth, wheeled locomotion has never been performed on a body with much lower gravity. Within the Japanese Martian Moon eXploration (MMX) mission, a wheeled rover will land on the Martian Moon Phobos with a gravity of about 1/2000 of the Earth gravity. The Robotic and Mechatronics Center of the German Aerospace Center (DLR-RMC) has designed and built the locomotion subsystem (LSS) for this rover. As the first ever driving gear for milli-gravity, the LSS needed to undergo a comprehensive qualification campaign. Due to the very challenging timeline of this project, the extent of the campaign needed to be carefully tailored to the needs of the mission. This work describes the concept of the verification including some crucial tailoring choices that have been made. The individual domains of verification are then described in detail with their scope, setup, procedure and results. The goal of this publication is to give a good overview and a detailed insight into the verification of the LSS for milli-gravity. Besides follow-up missions to Phobos, this work is also a good foundation for the qualification of future driving gears for low gravity environments or small rovers in general.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据