4.7 Article

Kunitz-type protease inhibitor TFPI2 remodels stemness and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in glioblastoma

期刊

NATURE IMMUNOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41590-023-01605

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The protein TFPI2 plays a critical role in connecting glioblastoma stem cells and immunosuppressive microglia, promoting tumor growth and immunosuppression. Inhibiting the TFPI2-CD51-STAT6 signaling axis activates T cells and enhances the effectiveness of anti-PD1 therapy in glioblastoma mouse models. TFPI2 is positively correlated with stemness, microglia abundance, immunosuppression, and poor prognosis in human glioblastoma.
Glioblastoma (GBM) tumors consist of multiple cell populations, including self-renewing glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) and immunosuppressive microglia. Here we identified Kunitz-type protease inhibitor TFPI2 as a critical factor connecting these cell populations and their associated GBM hallmarks of stemness and immunosuppression. TFPI2 promotes GSC self-renewal and tumor growth via activation of the c-Jun N-terminal kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)3 pathway. Secreted TFPI2 interacts with its functional receptor CD51 on microglia to trigger the infiltration and immunosuppressive polarization of microglia through activation of STAT6 signaling. Inhibition of the TFPI2-CD51-STAT6 signaling axis activates T cells and synergizes with anti-PD1 therapy in GBM mouse models. In human GBM, TFPI2 correlates positively with stemness, microglia abundance, immunosuppression and poor prognosis. Our study identifies a function for TFPI2 and supports therapeutic targeting of TFPI2 as an effective strategy for GBM. Here the authors show that TFPI2 promotes glioblastoma stem cell self-renewal and connects stemness to microglia immunosuppression, plus targeting TFPI2-mediated glioblastoma stem cell-microglia symbiosis inhibits tumor growth and synergizes with anti-PD1 therapy in glioblastoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据