4.4 Article

Survival after combined resection and ablation is not inferior to that after resection alone, in patients with four or more colorectal liver metastases

期刊

LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY
卷 408, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03082-1

关键词

Colorectal liver metastases; Ablation; Survival; Hepatobiliary; Surgery

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the efficacy of liver resection combined with local ablative therapy compared to liver resection only, in the treatment of patients with = 4 colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). The results show that combined resection-ablation is a viable option for patients with = 4 CRLM in terms of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).
Purpose Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are the predominant factor limiting survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Multimodal treatment strategies are frequently necessary to achieve total tumor elimination. This study examines the efficacy of liver resection combined with local ablative therapy in comparison to liver resection only, in the treatment of patients with = 4 CRLM.Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Germany. Patients with = 4 CRLM in preoperative imaging, who underwent curative resection between 2010-2021, were included. Recurrent resections and deaths in the early postoperative phase were excluded. Ablation modalities included radiofrequency or microwave ablation, and irreversible electroporation. Differences in overall- (OS) and recurrence-free-survival (RFS) between patients undergoing combined resection-ablation vs. resection only, were examined.Results Of 178 included patients, 46 (27%) underwent combined resection-ablation and 132 (73%) resection only. Apart from increased rates of adjuvant chemotherapy in the first group (44% vs. 25%, p = 0.014), there were no differences in perioperative systemic therapy. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test analyses showed no statistically significant differences in median OS (36 months for both, p = 0.638) or RFS (9 months for combined resection-ablation vs. 8 months, p = 0.921). Cox regression analysis showed a hazard ratio of 0.891 (p = 0.642) for OS and 0.981 (p = 0.924) for RFS, for patients undergoing resection only.Conclusion For patients with = 4 CRLM, combined resection-ablation is a viable option in terms of OS and RFS. Therefore, combined resection-ablation should be considered for complete tumor clearance, in patients with multifocal disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据