4.6 Article

Destabilization of lithium hydride and the thermodynamic assessment of the Li-Al-H system for solar thermal energy storage

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 6, 期 97, 页码 94927-94933

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ra16983j

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) for ARC Linkage [LP120100435, LP150100730]
  2. ARC LIEF [LE0989180, LE0775551]
  3. Danish National Research Foundation
  4. Center for Materials Crystallography [DNRF93]
  5. Innovation Fund Denmark (project HyFill-Fast)
  6. Danish Research Council for Nature and Universe (Danscatt)
  7. Carlsberg Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium hydride destabilised with aluminium, LiH-Al (1 : 1 mole ratio) was systematically studied and its suitability as a thermal energy storage system in Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) applications was assessed. Pressure composition isotherms (PCI) measured between 506 degrees C and 652 degrees C were conducted to investigate the thermodynamics of H-2 release. Above the peritectic temperature (596 degrees C) of LiAl, PCI measurements were not consistently reproducible, possibly due to the presence of a molten phase. However, below 596 degrees C, the hydrogen desorption enthalpy and entropy of LiH-Al was Delta H-des = 96.8 kJ (mol H-2)(-1) and Delta S-des = 114.3 J (K mol H-2)(-1), respectively LiH(s) at 956 degrees C, Delta H-des = 133.0 kJ (mol H-2)(-1) and Delta S-des = 110.0 J (K mol H-2)(-1). Compared to pure LiH, the Li-Al-H system has a reduced operating temperature (1 bar H-2 pressure at T similar to 574 degrees C) that, combined with favourable attributes such as high reversibility, good kinetics and negligible hysteresis, makes the Li-Al-H system a potential candidate for solar thermal energy storage applications. Compared to pure LiH, the addition of Al can reduce the cost of the raw materials by up to 44%. This cost reduction is insufficient for next generation CSP but highlights the potential to improve the properties and cost of high temperature hydrides via destabilisation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据