4.6 Article

Ab initio static and dynamic study of CH3NH3PbI3 degradation in the presence of water, hydroxyl radicals, and hydroxide ions

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 6, 期 80, 页码 76938-76947

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ra12781a

关键词

-

资金

  1. CityU Start-up Grant [7200397]
  2. CityU SRG Fund [7004166]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Perovskite solar cells have attracted great attention in the past few years due to their many advantages like superb photovoltaic and electronic properties, simple fabrication procedures and low price of raw materials. However, numerous studies have demonstrated that the perovskite materials degrade rapidly under humid air and sunlight, which greatly hinders perovskite solar cells from practical application. In this paper, density functional theory (DFT) calculations are combined with the ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) and climbing image nudged elastic band (CI-NEB) techniques to unveil the microscopic details of the degradation of CH3NH3PbI3 (MAPbI(3)). DFT calculations show that bulk MAPbI(3) reacts readily with water molecules to form a monohydrate MAPbI(3)center dot H2O phase. However, subsequent degradation of this monohydrate is energetically unfavorable. On the other hand, in the presence of hydroxyl or hydroxide species, we identify possible pathways that lead to the full decomposition of MAPbI(3) to the experimentally-identified degradation products. Furthermore, AIMD simulations were carried out to study the dynamics of the interaction of water molecules, hydroxyl radicals and hydroxide ions with the (110) surface of MAPbI(3). Hydrogen transfer (or proton transfer) between the OH (or OH-) species and the CH3NH3 cation of the MAPbI(3) surface was observed within the first 1 to 2 ps. Lastly, we studied the possible infiltration of H2O molecules, OH radicals and OH- ions in the (110) surface of MAPbI(3) using the CI-NEB technique. The energy barriers for the infiltration processes in the three cases were found to be comparable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据