4.5 Article

Loads scheduling for demand response in energy communities

期刊

COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH
卷 160, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2023.106358

关键词

Energy communities; Loads scheduling; Column generation heuristic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper focuses on optimizing the collective self-consumption rate in energy communities by scheduling members' loads. The proposed strategy aims to implement a Demand Side Management program using controllable loads' characteristics. A MILP formulation is used to give optimal planning for electrical devices' operations and minimize energy flows from the public grid. Additionally, a column generation-based heuristic is developed for large problem instances. Numerical experiments show that joining an energy community saves money on energy bills and reduces energy drawn from the primary grid by at least 15%.
This paper focuses on optimizing the collective self-consumption rate in energy communities by scheduling members' loads. The community remains connected to the public grid and comprises prosumers, traditional consumers, and distributed storage units. Prosumers can exchange their energy with the public grid or other members. The proposed strategy aims at implementing a Demand Side Management program taking advantage of controllable loads' characteristics. A MILP formulation of the problem allows, on the one hand, to give the optimal planning for electrical devices' operations. On the other hand, it provides optimal solutions for managing the storage units, peer-to-peer exchanges, and interactions with the public grid to minimize the energy flows from the public grid over time. However, this MILP only allows for solving small problem instances. Thus, we develop a column generation-based heuristic for large problem instances. Our numerical experiments based on real data collected in the south of France show that joining an energy community saves money on energy bills and reduces the total energy drawn from the primary grid by at least 15%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据