3.8 Article

Preparing infrastructure for surprise: fusing synthetic network, interdependency, and cascading failure models

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/2634-4505/acd07d

关键词

infrastructure; synthetic; networks; cascading failure; interdependency; risk analysis; black swan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the face of destabilizing conditions in the Anthropocene, infrastructure resilience modeling is challenged by data gaps, interconnected systems, and accurate behavior estimation. However, novel approaches in interdependency modeling, cascading failure modeling, and synthetic network generation offer significant opportunities for advancing our understanding of vulnerabilities and investing in resilience.
Faced with destabilizing conditions in the Anthropocene, infrastructure resilience modeling remains challenged to confront increasingly complex conditions toward quickly and meaningfully advancing adaptation. Data gaps, increasingly interconnected systems, and accurate behavior estimation (across scales and as both gradual and cascading failure) remain challenges for infrastructure modelers. Yet novel approaches are emerging-largely independently-that, if brought together, offer significant opportunities for rapidly advancing how we understand vulnerabilities and surgically invest in resilience. Of particular promise are interdependency modeling, cascading failure modeling, and synthetic network generation. We describe a framework for integrating these three domains toward an integrated modeling framework to estimate infrastructure networks where no data exist, connect infrastructure to establish interdependencies, assess the vulnerabilities of these interconnected infrastructure to hazards, and simulate how failures may propagate across systems. We draw from the literature as an evidence base, provide a conceptual structure for implementation, and conclude by discussing the significance of such a framework and the critical tools it may provide to infrastructure researchers and managers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据