4.6 Article

Catalytic activity of ?-Al2O3(110) in the NO + H-2 reaction: a DFT study

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 25, 期 36, 页码 24686-24695

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3cp02909c

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the interaction between the surface of ?-Al2O3(110) and NO and H2 was investigated using density functional theory calculations. The results showed that ?-Al2O3(110) can adsorb NO and bind H atoms, but repels H2 molecules. The catalytic activity of ?-Al2O3(110) is provided by a triplet of low-coordinated OII-Al-III-O-II atoms.
In this work, the interaction of the surface of ?-Al2O3(110) with NO and H2 was studied using density functional theory calculations. Free ?-Al2O3(110) adsorbs NO and binds H atoms, but repels the H2 molecule. A triplet of low-coordinated OII-Al-III-O-II atoms provides the catalytic activity of?-Al2O3(110) along the path: (i) the adsorption of NO/Al-III is followed by the binding of H(2)( )to form a hydroxylamine derivative NHOH through an intermediate NO/Al-III + 2 x H/O-II complex; (ii) recombination of NHOH with the release of N2 through an intermediate NHOH/AlIII + NHOH/AlIV or adsorption of NO followed by the release of N2O through the intermediate NHOH/Al-III + NO/Al-IV; the pathway ends with the regeneration of ?-Al2O3(110). The calculated adsorption heats ensure the diffusion of H atoms from the deposited Pt to the surface (110), initiating the formation of the NH2/Al-III + H/O-II complex, which releases NH3 endothermically and is stable enough to inhibit stage (ii) of the above reaction pathway. An excess of O-2 in the NO + H(2 )mixture excludes H/Pt and eliminates inhibition. The formation of oxynitrides is suppressed, but not excluded by more exothermic surface processes. The N-doped conductivity of bulk and surface oxynitrides Al32O47N and the dependence of the heat of adsorption of H atoms on the band gap width were revealed, which suggests a relationship between the band gap width and catalytic activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据