4.6 Article

Hyperspectral mapping of nanoscale photophysics and degradation processes in hybrid perovskite at the single grain level

期刊

NANOSCALE ADVANCES
卷 5, 期 18, 页码 4687-4695

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3na00529a

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers used cathodoluminescence microscopy and unsupervised machine learning to study how nanoscale heterogeneity accumulates within the structure of hybrid perovskite under external stimuli. They found that there was no significant change in the performance of hybrid perovskite under high-energy electron beam excitation, which can be used to study its degradation process.
With solar cells reaching 26.1% certified efficiency, hybrid perovskites are now the most efficient thin film photovoltaic material. Though substantial effort has focussed on synthesis approaches and device architectures to further improve perovskite-based solar cells, more work is needed to correlate physical properties of the underlying film structure with device performance. Here, using cathodoluminescence microscopy coupled with unsupervisedmachine learning, we quantify how nanoscale heterogeneity globally builds up within a large morphological grain of hybrid perovskite when exposed to extrinsic stimuli such as charge accumulation from electron beams or milder environmental factors like humidity. The converged electron-beam excitation allows us to map PbI2 and the emergence of other intermediate phases with high spatial and energy resolution. In contrast with recent reports of hybrid perovskite cathodoluminescence, we observe no significant change in the PbI2 signatures, even after highenergy electron beam excitation. In fact, we can exploit the stable PbI2 signatures to quantitatively map how hybrid perovskites degrade. Moreover, we showhow ourmethodology allows disentangling of the photophysics associated with photon recycling and band-edge emission with sub-micron resolution using a fundamental understanding of electron interactions in hybrid perovskites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据