4.8 Article

Seeing Is Not Necessarily Believing: Is the Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Signal Really from the Target?

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 95, 期 35, 页码 13346-13352

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c02683

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reagent purity is crucial in experimental research to avoid wrong conclusions or interference caused by ultratrace impurities. In the field of surface science, impurities can have a significant negative effect due to strong interaction with the surface. This study reveals the distortion of SERS performance caused by trace impurities in DECMP and emphasizes the need for reliable SERS qualitative analysis guidelines to exclude potential misleading effects of ultratrace impurities strongly adsorbed on Au or Ag surfaces.
Reagent purity is crucial to experimental research, considering that the ignorance of ultratrace impurities may induce wrong conclusions in either revealing the reaction nature or qualifying the target. Specifically, in the field of surface science, the strong interaction between the impurity and the surface will bring a non-negligible negative effect. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) is a highly surface-sensitive technique, providing fingerprint identification and near-single molecule sensitivity. In the SERS analysis of trace chloromethyl diethyl phosphate (DECMP), we figured out that the SERS performance of DECMP is significantly distorted by the trace impurities from DECMP. With the aid of gas chromatography-based techniques, one strongly interfering impurity (2,2-dichloro-N,N-dimethylacetamide), the byproduct during the synthesis of DECMP, was confirmed. Furthermore, the nonignorable interference of impurities on the SERS measurement of NaBr, NaI, or sulfadiazine was also observed. The generality ignited us to refresh and consolidate the guideline for the reliable SERS qualitative analysis, by which the potential misleading brought by ultratrace impurities, especially those strongly adsorbed on Au or Ag surfaces, could be well excluded.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据