4.5 Article

Validation of the fire dynamics simulator (FDS) model for fire scenarios with two liquid pool fires in multiple compartments

期刊

FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL
卷 141, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2023.103892

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A validation study was conducted on the FDS model for fire scenarios involving multiple liquid pool fires in multiple compartments. The study compared the results obtained from open and blind simulations with experimental data. The analysis showed that the input parameters, such as the MLRPUA time curve, significantly affected the output parameters in terms of bias factor and model standard deviation.
A validation study on the fire dynamics simulator (FDS) model for fire scenarios with multiple liquid pool fires occurring in multiple compartments was performed. For fire growth in the open simulation, the mass loss rate per unit area (MLRPUA) time curve obtained experimentally was used as the input. In the blind simulation, the pyrolysis model was used. For the ventilation flow rate curve, the supply/exhaust flow rate curve measured in the experiment was used as the input for the open simulation, whereas the quadratic fan curve model was used for the blind simulation. The time-averaged datasets of the output parameters from the FDS model and experiment were plotted as data points on scatter plots. In terms of bias factor and model standard deviation of output parameters, the scatter plots under the open simulation conditions were compared with those of NUREG-1824. Under blind simulation conditions, the bias factor and model standard deviation of output pa-rameters increased significantly. A sensitivity analysis was performed on input parameters, such as the MLRPUA time curve, supply/exhaust flow time curve, compartment leak area, and maximum differential pressure in the compartment. Within the given ranges of the sensitivity input parameter values, only changing the MLRPAU time curve significantly affected the bias factor and model standard deviation of the output parameters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据