4.6 Article

Antimicrobial activity of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum against shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 134, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jambio/lxad202

关键词

lactic acid bacteria; plantaricin; Shiga toxin-producing E. coli

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study characterized the Lactiplantibacillus sp. LP5 strain isolated from pork production and identified bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances produced by this strain. LP5 was identified as Lactiplantibacillus plantarum. The bacteriocins produced by LP5 showed inhibitory effects on a Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strain. The presence of genes encoding specific plantaricins was confirmed by PCR and whole genome sequencing.
Aims The aim of the present work was to characterize the Lactiplantibacillus sp. LP5 strain, isolated from pork production, and identify bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances produced by this strain.Methods and Results In this study, LP5 was identified by species-specific PCR and 16S rRNA sequencing. Additionally, bacterial growth kinetics, antimicrobial activity, the detection of genes related to plantaricin production, and the genetic expression of plantaricins were determined. Lactiplantibacillus sp. LP5 was identified as Lactiplantibacillus plantarum. The well-diffusion test using cell-free supernatants (CFS), neutralized CFS, CFS treated with catalase, and CFS treated with proteinase K showed that inhibitory effects on a Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) strain were produced by bacteriocins. The PCR technique allowed the detection of genes encoding E/F plantaricins, as well as J/K and whole genome sequencing, and bacteriocin mining analysis allowed us to confirm the presence of these plantaricins.Conclusions We can conclude that the inhibitory effect of L. plantarum LP5 isolated from pigs against the STEC EDL933 strain could be associated with the bacteriocins production and represents a potential use as a probiotic strain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据