4.6 Article

Egg white-mediated green synthesis of CuS quantum dots as a biocompatible and efficient 980 nm laser-driven photothermal agent

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 6, 期 46, 页码 40480-40488

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ra26801j

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51272299, 51473033]
  2. Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology [13JC1400300]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. DHU Distinguished Young Professor Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Near-infrared (NIR) laser-induced photothermal ablation therapy (PAT) has great potential to revolutionize conventional therapeutic approaches for tumors, and a prerequisite is to obtain biocompatible and efficient photothermal agents. CuS nanomaterials have been demonstrated to be good photothermal agents, and they are usually prepared with organics/polymers as the surface ligands at high temperature (50-300 degrees C). To enhance the biocompatibility and photothermal performance of CuS, herein we develop a green and straightforward method for preparing CuS quantum dots (QDs) by using chicken egg white (CEW) as the surface ligands at physiological temperature (similar to 37 degrees C). CuS QDs have the diameter of 7.1 +/- 0.6 nm and exhibit strong NIR photoabsorption. Under the irradiation of a 980 nm laser with intensity of 0.44 W cm(-2), the CuS QD aqueous dispersions (0.25-1.0 mg mL(-1)) exhibit a temperature elevation of 17.2-37.4 degrees C in 8 min, yielding a photothermal conversion efficiency of 47.2%. Furthermore, CuS QDs exhibit almost no cytotoxicity on cell growth, due to the good encapsulation by highly nutritional proteins from the CEW. More importantly, under the irradiation of a 980 nm laser (0.44 W cm(-2), a low/safe intensity for human skin) for 6 min, cancer cells in vitro and in vivo can be efficiently ablated by the photothermal effects of CuS QDs. Therefore, CuS QDs can be used as a kind of promising, biocompatible and efficient photothermal agent for NIR-PAT of tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据