4.7 Article

Improving mechanical and life cycle environmental performances of recycled CFRP automotive component by fibre architecture preservation

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107749

关键词

Carbon fibres; Recycling; Mechanical analysis; Life Cycle Assessment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research investigates the effects of fibre architecture preservation during the recycling of carbon fibres on the mechanical and environmental performances of rCFRP for use in a vehicle roof panel. The results show that rCFRPs with preserved unidirectional and woven fibre architectures have significantly higher flexural properties compared to those with unpreserved fibre architecture. Moreover, when used in gasoline vehicle and battery electric vehicle, a hypothetical rCFRP roof panel with preserved plain woven rCF reduces the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions by 11% and 23% respectively, compared to the current rCFRP.
Recycled carbon fibre reinforced polymer (rCFRP) is attracting interest for automotive applications but has reduced mechanical properties due to a loss of intact fibre architecture. This study investigates the effects of fibre architecture preservation during recycling of carbon fibres on the mechanical and life cycle environmental performances of rCFRP applied to a vehicle roof panel. Results show that rCFRPs with preserved unidirectional and woven fibre architectures have average flexural properties at least 4 times higher than those of current rCFRP with unpreserved fibre architecture. A hypothetical rCFRP roof panel with preserved plain woven rCF reduces the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions by 11% and 23% compared to the current rCFRP, respectively, when used in gasoline vehicle and battery electric vehicle. This paper demonstrates that the recycling approach with fibre architecture preservation offers great opportunities to improve the mechanical and environmental performances of rCFRP for use in the automotive industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据