4.2 Article

Kidney transplant outcomes in patients with antibodies to human neutrophil antigen 3a

期刊

TRANSPLANT IMMUNOLOGY
卷 81, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2023.101905

关键词

Kidney transplantation; Acute rejection; Immunohistochemistry; Autoantibodies; Graft survival

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The presence of HNA-3a antibodies may contribute to the development of ABMR in kidney transplant recipients without a known DSA. This finding suggests the importance of screening at-risk groups for HNA antibodies to guide immunosuppressive therapy.
Background: Antibody mediated rejection (ABMR) of kidney transplants has been shown to occur in the absence of a known donor specific antibody to human leucocyte antigen (HLA). Antibodies to the human neutrophil antigen (HNA) system have been detected in kidney transplant recipients and linked to ABMR in the absence of an HLA donor specific antibody (DSA), but there remains limited literature regarding this.Methods: Case series analysis was carried out examining three cases of HNA-3a antibody positive flow cytometry cross match (FC-XM) from two transplant centres in Scotland.Results: All patients included were female and had been sensitised as a result of pregnancy. One live donor recipient with HNA-3a antibodies identified prior to transplant received ATG induction and has had a good outcome. The remaining two patients received deceased donor transplants. HNA-3a antibodies were indicated following a retrospective flow cytometry crossmatch. Both patients received Basiliximab induction and both have experienced ABMR requiring supplementary immunosuppression.Conclusions: The predicted rate of HNA-3a antibodies amongst patients awaiting kidney transplant in the UK is <1%. However, with increasing evidence to support a role for HNA-3a antibodies in the development of ABMR there may be value in screening at risk groups to allow for augmented immunosuppression to be considered at the time of kidney transplant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据