4.7 Article

Probing the interaction of cephalosporin antibiotic cefoperazone with lysozyme using spectroscopic and in silico methods: Effect of paracetamol on binding

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.126568

关键词

Lysozyme; Cefoperazone; Molecular docking; Molecular dynamics; Drug-protein interaction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interaction between lysozyme and cefoperazone was studied using spectroscopic and computational approaches. The UV-visible spectrum showed a change in lysozyme in the presence of cefoperazone, indicating complex formation. Fluorescence spectroscopy suggested a fair interaction via dynamic quenching, with a binding ratio of approximately 1:1. In silico studies revealed that hydrophobic forces played a major role in the interaction, with some involvement of hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions.
The interaction of lysozyme with cefoperazone was studied by means of spectroscopic and computational ap-proaches. The change in the UV-visible spectrum of lysozyme in presence of cefoperazone was an indication of the complex formation between them. Fluorescence spectroscopy suggested that there was a fair interaction between the protein and drug which was taken place via dynamic quenching mechanism and the binding ratio was approximately 1:1. The binding was energetically feasible and principally supported by the hydrophobic forces. CD spectroscopic studies have shown that cefoperazone induced the secondary structure of lysozyme by increasing the & alpha;-helical contents of the latter. In silico studies revealed that the large nonpolar cavity was the preferred binding site of cefoperazone within lysozyme and the interaction was taken place mainly through hydrophobic forces with small involvement of hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions which is in good agreement with the experimental analyses. Effect of paracetamol was also seen on the binding and it was found that paracetamol had a negative influence on the binding between cefoperazone and lysozyme.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据