4.7 Article

Modification of In-situ N-doped graphene coated ZnO composites as anode for high performance lithium-ion batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 967, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.171731

关键词

Graphene; ZnO; Lithium-ion batteries; Ion Diffusion; Core-shell; Yolk-shell

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To overcome the limitations of ZnO as an anode material for lithium-ion batteries, researchers synthesized ZnO nanoparticles wrapped in N-doped multilayer graphene (ZnO@C) through chemical vapor deposition. The ZnO@C composite exhibited improved specific capacity, rate performance, cycle stability, and conductivity. By optimizing the thickness of the graphene layer and the filling rate of ZnO in a yolk-shell structure, a reversible specific capacity of 390 mAh/g after 200 cycles at 0.25 A/g and a capacity of 204.6 mAh/g at 1 A/g were achieved.
The application of ZnO with high theoretical specific capacity as anode material for lithium-ion batteries is severely limited due to volume expansion during continuous cycling, slow lithium-ion diffusion, and poor conductivity. Here, ZnO nanoparticles were wrapped in N-doped multilayer graphene (ZnO@C) by chemical vapor deposition to improve specific capacity, rate performance, cycle stability, and conductivity. The thickness of the graphene layer and filling rate of ZnO in yolk-shell structure were investigated for the best electrochemical performance. The ZnO@C of yolk-shell structure with filling rate of 28% has a reversible specific capacity of 390 mAh/g after 200 cycles at 0.25 A/g, and achieves a capacity of 204.6 mAh/g at a high current of 1 A/g. The results show that N-doped porous graphene coated ZnO yolk-shell structure composites with etching treatment have good rate performance and cycle stability. The performance of electronic conductivity and lithium-ion diffusion is greatly improved, and the pseudocapacitive effect in the lithium storage mechanism is enhanced.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据