4.5 Article

Effects of thread size in the implant neck area on peri-implant hard and soft tissues: an animal study

期刊

CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
卷 27, 期 9, 页码 1187-1192

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/clr.12720

关键词

animal experiments; bone implant interactions; CT imaging; morphometric analysis; soft tissue-implant interactions

资金

  1. Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE), Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT)
  2. Dae Gyeong Institute for Regional Program Evaluation (DGIRPE) through Leading Industry Development for Economic Region [R0001279]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The aim of this animal study was to examine the effects of thread size in the implant neck area on peri-implant tissues in terms of BIC and hard-and soft-tissue dimensions. Materials and methods: Six Beagle dogs received experimental implants in the mandible 3 month after the removal of premolars and first molars (P2, P3, P4, and M1). Two different types of implants were installed in each animal: Anyone microthread (R) as Group 1 and Anyone (R) as Group 2. Resonance frequency test, intraoral radiography, micro-CT, and histomorphometry were used to evaluate peri-implant tissue after implantation periods of 4 and 8 weeks. Results: No remarkable complication was observed during the healing period in either group. Resonance frequency testing revealed no significant difference between groups. In radiographic evaluation, Group 2 showed more bone loss than Group 1. However, this difference was not statistically significant. In the micro-CT analysis, BIC and BIV values and soft-tissue height were not significant in both groups. Histological analysis revealed no significant difference in BIC ratio, bone density, or bone loss between groups. However, soft-tissue height was significantly greater in Group 2 than in Group 1 (P = 0.0004). Conclusion: No difference in peri-implant hard or soft tissues was observed according to thread size in the implant neck area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据