4.3 Article

Niclosamide and its analogs are potent inhibitors of Wnt/β-catenin, mTOR and STAT3 signaling in ovarian cancer

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 7, 期 52, 页码 86803-86815

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.13466

关键词

ovarian cancer; chemoresistance; cancer stem cells; targeted therapy; Wnt pathway

资金

  1. NIH grant [P30 AR48311]
  2. NIH Research Training Program in Basic and Translation Oncology T32 Grant [T32CA183926]
  3. Foundation for Women's Cancer (WeRoc/OChO Ovarian Cancer Research Grant)
  4. Norma Livingston Foundation
  5. AAOGF/ABOG Career Development Award
  6. NHLBI Diversity Supplement [HHSN268201300001]
  7. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, New Connections Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the leading cause of gynecologic cancer mortality worldwide. Platinum-based therapy is the standard first line treatment and while most patients initially respond, resistance to chemotherapy usually arises. Major signaling pathways frequently upregulated in chemoresistant cells and important in the maintenance of cancer stem cells (CSCs) include Wnt/beta-catenin, mTOR, and STAT3. The major objective of our study was to investigate the treatment of ovarian cancer with targeted agents that inhibit these three pathways. Here we demonstrate that niclosamide, a salicylamide derivative, and two synthetically manufactured niclosamide analogs (analog 11 and 32) caused significant inhibition of proliferation of two chemoresistant ovarian cancer cell lines (A2780cp20 and SKOV3Trip2), tumorspheres isolated from the ascites of EOC patients, and cells from a chemoresistant patient-derived xenograft (PDX). This work shows that all three agents significantly decreased the expression of proteins in the Wnt/beta-catenin, mTOR and STAT3 pathways and preferentially targeted cells that expressed the ovarian CSC surface protein CD133. It also illustrates the potential of drug repurposing for chemoresistant EOC and can serve as a basis for pathway-oriented in vivo studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据