4.3 Article

Prostate extracellular vesicles in patient plasma as a liquid biopsy platform for prostate cancer using nanoscale flow cytometry

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 7, 期 8, 页码 8839-8849

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.6983

关键词

prostate microparticles; extracellular vesicles; nanoscale flow cytometry; prostate cancer; liquid biopsy

资金

  1. Prostate Cancer Canada/Movember Rising Star recipient Grant [RS2013-56]
  2. Sanofi Aventis
  3. Lawson Health Research Institute
  4. Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) Fellowship Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Extracellular vesicles released by prostate cancer present in seminal fluid, urine, and blood may represent a non-invasive means to identify and prioritize patients with intermediate risk and high risk of prostate cancer. We hypothesize that enumeration of circulating prostate microparticles (PMPs), a type of extracellular vesicle (EV), can identify patients with Gleason Score >= 4+4 prostate cancer (PCa) in a manner independent of PSA. Patients and Methods: Plasmas from healthy volunteers, benign prostatic hyperplasia patients, and PCa patients with various Gleason score patterns were analyzed for PMPs. We used nanoscale flow cytometry to enumerate PMPs which were defined as submicron events (100-1000nm) immunoreactive to anti-PSMA mAb when compared to isotype control labeled samples. Levels of PMPs (counts/mu L of plasma) were also compared to CellSearch CTC Subclasses in various PCa metastatic disease subtypes (treatment naive, castration resistant prostate cancer) and in serially collected plasma sets from patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Results: PMP levels in plasma as enumerated by nanoscale flow cytometry are effective in distinguishing PCa patients with Gleason Score >= 8 disease, a high-risk prognostic factor, from patients with Gleason Score <= 7 PCa, which carries an intermediate risk of PCa recurrence. PMP levels were independent of PSA and significantly decreased after surgical resection of the prostate, demonstrating its prognostic potential for clinical follow-up. CTC subclasses did not decrease after prostatectomy and were not effective in distinguishing localized PCa patients from metastatic PCa patients. Conclusions: PMP enumeration was able to identify patients with Gleason Score >= 8 PCa but not patients with Gleason Score 4+3 PCa, but offers greater confidence than CTC counts in identifying patients with metastatic prostate cancer. CTC Subclass analysis was also not effective for post-prostatectomy follow up and for distinguishing metastatic PCa and localized PCa patients. Nanoscale flow cytometry of PMPs presents an emerging biomarker platform for various stages of prostate cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据