4.3 Article

Presence of TMPRSS2-ERG is associated with alterations of the metabolic profile in human prostate cancer

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 7, 期 27, 页码 42071-42085

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9817

关键词

metabolomics; citrate; spermine; HR-MAS; MRSI

资金

  1. Central Norway Regional Health Authority (RHA)
  2. RHA
  3. Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)
  4. Norwegian Cancer Society
  5. Nanne and Karin Gullord's foundation at the structural engineering company Alfr. Andersen Mek. Verksted & Stoberi A/S in Larvik. Norway

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TMPRSS2-ERG has been proposed to be a prognostic marker for prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to identify changes in metabolism, genes and biochemical recurrence related to TMPRSS2-ERG by using an integrated approach, combining metabolomics, transcriptomics, histopathology and clinical data in a cohort of 129 human prostate samples (41 patients). Metabolic analyses revealed lower concentrations of citrate and spermine comparing ERG(high) to ERG(low) samples, suggesting an increased cancer aggressiveness of ERG(high) compared to ERG(low). These results could be validated in a separate cohort, consisting of 40 samples (40 patients), and magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) indicated an in vivo translational potential. Alterations of gene expression levels associated with key enzymes in the metabolism of citrate and polyamines were in consistence with the metabolic results. Furthermore, the metabolic alterations between ERG(high) and ERG(low) were more pronounced in low Gleason samples than in high Gleason samples, suggesting it as a potential tool for risk stratification. However, no significant difference in biochemical recurrence was detected, although a trend towards significance was detected for low Gleason samples. Using an integrated approach, this study suggests TMPRSS2-ERG as a potential risk stratification tool for inclusion of active surveillance patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据