4.3 Article

Targeting the ERK pathway for the treatment of Cushing's disease

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 7, 期 43, 页码 69149-69158

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12381

关键词

adrenocorticotropic hormone; Cushing's disease; proopiomelanocortin; testicular receptor 4

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We recently demonstrated that the orphan nuclear receptor testicular receptor 4 (TR4) is a potent regulator of corticotroph tumor growth and hormone secretion. The Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway is commonly overactivated in human tumors and we have demonstrated that corticotroph tumor TR4 is activated by ERK1/2-mediated phosphorylation. We evaluated effects of MEK-162, a selective, non-ATP-competitive allosteric inhibitor of MEK1/2, on murine and human in vitro and in vivo corticotroph tumor proliferation and adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) secretion. MEK-162 treatment dose-dependently inhibited corticotroph tumor proliferation, induced apoptosis, reduced pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) mRNA levels and inhibited ACTH secretion in vitro. Similar findings were obtained in human corticotroph tumor primary cultures (n = 5). These actions of MEK-162 were augmented in the presence of TR4 overexpression, suggesting that TR4 levels may serve as a predictive biomarker of MEK-162 corticotroph tumor responsiveness. Additionally, MEK-162 treatment reduced TR4 protein expression and blocked recruitment of TR4 to bind its consensus site on the POMC promoter (-854bp to -637bp), elucidating multiple mechanisms to control TR4 corticotroph tumor actions. In a murine corticotroph tumor in vivo model of Cushing's disease, MEK-162 treatment inhibited tumor growth and reduced tumor-derived circulating plasma ACTH, and corticosterone levels. These results demonstrate the potent actions of MEK-162 to inhibit corticotroph tumor growth and hormone secretion in vitro and in vivo via TR4-dependent and independent mechanisms, and raise the possibility of MEK-162 as a novel therapy for Cushing's disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据