4.3 Article

O-mannosylation and N-glycosylation: two coordinated mechanisms regulating the tumour suppressor functions of E-cadherin in cancer

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 7, 期 40, 页码 65231-65246

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.11245

关键词

E-cadherin; O-mannosylation; N-glycosylation; gastric cancer

资金

  1. FCT, the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology
  2. FEDER - Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional funds through the COMPETE 2020 - Operacional Programme for Competitiveness and Internationalisation (POCI), Portugal
  3. Portuguese funds through FCT [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007274]
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Sonderforschungsbereich 1036]
  5. [PTDC/DTP-PIC/0560/2014]
  6. [PTDC/BBB-EBI/0567/20141]
  7. [SERH/BD/77386/2011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dysregulation of tumor suppressor protein E-cadherin is an early molecular event in cancer. O-mannosylation profile of E-cadherin is a newly-described post-ranslational modification crucial for its adhesive functions in homeostasis. However, the role of O-mannosyl glycans in E-cadherin-mediated cell adhesion in cancer and their interplay with N-glycans remains largely unknown. We herein demonstrated that human gastric carcinomas exhibiting a non-functional E-cadherin display a reduced expression of O-mannosyl glycans concomitantly with increased modification with branched complex N-glycans. Accordingly, overexpression of MGAT5-mediated branched N-glycans both in gastric cancer cells and transgenic mice models led to a significant decrease of O-mannosyl glycans attached to E-cadherin that was associated with impairment of its tumour suppressive functions. Importantly, overexpression of protein O-mannosyltransferase 2 (POMT2) induced a reduced expression of branched N-glycans which led to a protective effect of E-cadherin biological functions. Overall, our results reveal a newly identified mechanism of (dys) regulation of E-cadherin that occur through the interplay between O-mannosylation and N-glycosylation pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据