4.3 Article

Cooperation between AlphavBeta3 integrin and the fibroblast growth factor receptor enhances proliferation of Hox-overexpressing acute myeloid leukemia cells

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 7, 期 34, 页码 54782-54794

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.10189

关键词

transcription factor; integrin; leukemia; myeloid cell; homeobox; fibroblast growth factor

资金

  1. Mander Foundation
  2. Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center
  3. [NIH-CA195642]
  4. [VA-BX002067]
  5. [NIH-CA77816]
  6. [CA121192]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A poor prognosis subtype of acute myeloid leukemia ( AML) is characterized by increased expression of a set of homeodomain ( HD) transcription factors, including HoxA9, HoxA10 and Cdx4. This encompasses AML with MLL1 gene translocations, because Mll1-fusion proteins aberrantly activate HOX transcription. We previously identified FGF2 ( Fibroblast Growth Factor 2) as a target gene for HoxA9 and HoxA10 that was indirectly activated by Mll-Ell ( an Mll1-fusion protein). Autocrine stimulation of Mll-Ell(+) myeloid progenitor cells by Fgf2 stabilized beta catenin and increased expression of beta catenin target genes, including CDX4. Since HOXA9 and HOXA10 are Cdx4 target genes, Fgf2 indirectly augmented direct effects of Mll-Ell on these genes. ITGB3, encoding beta 3 integrin, is another HoxA10 target gene. In the current studies, we found activation of ITGB3 transcription in Mll-Ell(+) myeloid progenitor cells via HoxA9 and HoxA10. Increased expression of alpha v beta 3 integrin increased Syk-activation; contributing to cytokine hypersensitivity. However, inhibiting Fgf-R partly reversed alpha v beta 3 activity in Mll-Ell+ progenitor cells by decreasing ITGB3 promoter activity in a beta catenin- and Cdx4-dependent manner. Inhibitors of Fgf-R or Syk impaired proliferation of CD34(+) bone marrow cells from AML subjects with increased Hox-expression; with a greater combined effect. These studies identified a rational therapeutic approach to this AML subtype.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据