4.3 Article

Reduced genomic tumor heterogeneity after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is related to favorable outcome in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 7, 期 28, 页码 44084-44095

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9857

关键词

esophageal adenocarcinoma; array CGH; prognosis; chemotherapy

资金

  1. Cancer Research UK [C26441/A8944]
  2. Royal Marsden/Institute of Cancer Research
  3. Center for Translational Molecular Medicine, DeCoDe project [03O-101]
  4. Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS) [AMS-SGCL7-West] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. National Institute for Health Research [CL-2011-02-004] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neoadjuvant chemo(radio) therapy followed by surgery is the standard of care for patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). There is increasing evidence that drug resistance might be related to genomic heterogeneity. We investigated whether genomic tumor heterogeneity is different after cytotoxic chemotherapy and is associated with EAC patient survival. We used arrayCGH and a quantitative assessment of the whole genome DNA copy number aberration patterns ('DNA copy number entropy') to establish the level of genomic tumor heterogeneity in 80 EAC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery (CS group) or surgery alone (S group). The association between DNA copy number entropy, clinicopathological variables and survival was investigated. DNA copy number entropy was reduced after chemotherapy, even if there was no morphological evidence of response to therapy (p<0.001). Low DNA copy number entropy was associated with improved survival in the CS group (p=0.011) but not in the S group (p=0.396). Our results suggest that cytotoxic chemotherapy reduces DNA copy number entropy, which might be a more sensitive tumor response marker than changes in the morphological tumor phenotype. The use of DNA copy number entropy in clinical practice will require validation of our results in a prospective study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据