4.3 Review

Long noncoding RNA HOTTIP as a novel predictor of lymph node metastasis and survival in human cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 8, 期 8, 页码 14126-14132

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12981

关键词

lncRNA; HOTTIP; cancer; prognosis; lymph node metastasis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81402103]
  2. International S&T Cooperation program of China (ISTCP) [2014DFA31050]
  3. National Science Foundation Projects of Guangdong Province [2014A030313717]
  4. Shenzhen Municipal Government of China [ZDSYS201504301722174, JCYJ20150330102720130, GJHZ20150316154912494]
  5. Special Support Funds of Shenzhen for Introduced High-Level Medical Team

向作者/读者索取更多资源

HOXA transcript at the distal tip (HOTTIP), a functional lncRNA transcribed from the 5' tip of the HOXA locus, has been functionally characterized as an oncogene in various cancers. To further explore the clinical value of HOTTIP in cancer, we collected all relevant studies and investigated the association between HOTTIP level and lymph node metastasis (LNM) or overall survival (OS). Literature collection was conducted by searching electronic databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, OVID, Web of Science and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)(up to July 7, 2016). Seven studies with 652 cancer patients were included in the meta-analysis according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The results showed a significant positive association between HOTTIP levels and LNM (Odds ratio, OR = 2.30, 95 % CI: 1.58-3.35, p < 0.0001) in a fixed-effects model (I-2 = 0 %, p = 0.949) and it could also predict poor OS in cancer patients (Hazard ratio HR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.74-2.90, p < 0.00001) in a fixed-effects model (I-2 = 0%, p = 0.925). In conclusion, this meta-analysis demonstrated that the higher expression level of HOTTIP is correlated with positive LNM and poor OS in different types of cancer and HOTTIP might serve as a novel predictor of LNM and survival in human cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据