4.3 Article

DNA demethylating agent decitabine broadens the peripheral T cell receptor repertoire

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 7, 期 25, 页码 37882-37892

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9352

关键词

T cell receptor repertoire; pharmacometabonomics; decitabine; epigenetic therapy; solid tumor

资金

  1. Science and Technology Planning Project of Beijing City [Z151100003915076]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81472838, 81302166, 31270820, 81230061]
  3. Beijing Nova Program [Z121107002512121, Z141107001814098]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Decitabine, a promising epi-immunotherapeutic agent has shown clinical responses in solid tumor patients, while the anti-tumor mechanisms were unclear. We aimed to investigate the immunomodulatory effect of decitabine in peripheral T cells. Experimental design: We applied next-generation sequencing to investigate the complementarity-determining region 3 (CDR3) of the TCR beta gene, the diversity of which acts as the prerequisite for the host immune system to recognize the universal foreign antigens. We collected the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 4 patients, at baseline and after 2 cycles of low-dose decitabine therapy. Results: An increase of the unique productive sequences of the CDR3 of TCR beta was observed in all of the 4 patients after decitabine treatment, which was characterized by a lower abundance of expanded clones and increased TCR diversity compared with before decitabine treatment. Further analysis showed a tendency for CD4 T cells with an increased CD4/CD8 ratio in response to decitabine therapy. In addition, the genome-wide expression alterations confirmed the effects of decitabine on immune reconstitution, and the increase of TCR excision circles (TRECs) was validated. Conclusions: The low-dose DNMT inhibitor decitabine broadens the peripheral T cell repertoire, providing a novel role for the epigenetic modifying agent in anti-tumor immune enhancement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据