4.3 Article

Serum microRNA expression signatures as novel noninvasive biomarkers for prediction and prognosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 7, 期 24, 页码 36733-36742

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9166

关键词

muscle-invasive bladder cancer; microRNA; prediction; prognosis; serum

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81271916, 81472025, 81501822]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong [ZR2014HP001]
  3. Shandong Technological Development Project (STDP) [2014GSF118016, 2015GSF118052]
  4. Science Foundation of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
  5. Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Noninvasive biomarkers for predicting the risk of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) may expedite appropriate therapy and reduce morbidity and cost. Genome-wide miRNA analysis by Miseq sequencing followed by two phases of reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) assays were performed on serum from 207 MIBC patients, 285 nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients and 193 controls. A four-miRNA panel (miR-422a-3p, miR-486-3p, miR-103a-3p and miR-27a-3p) was developed for MIBC prediction with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.894 (95% CI, 0.846-0.931) for training set. Prospective evaluation of the miRNA panel revealed an AUC of 0.880 (95% CI, 0.834 to 0.917) in validation set, which was significantly higher than those of grade and urine cytology (both p < 0.05). Moreover, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that MIBC patients with low miR-486-3p and miR-103a-3p levels had worse overall survival (p = 0.002 and p = 0.034, respectively). Cox analysis indicated miR-486-3p and miR-103a-3p were independently associated with overall survival of MIBC (p = 0.042 and p = 0.021, respectively). In conclusion, serum miRNA signatures might have considerable clinical values in predicting and providing prognostic information for MIBC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据