4.7 Article

The Erythrocyte Fatty Acid Profile and Cognitive Function in Old Chinese Adults

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 8, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu8070385

关键词

erythrocyte fatty acids; lipids; cognition; the elderly

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81273071]
  2. State Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [81330065]
  3. Chinese Nutrition Society (CNS) Nutrition Research Foundation-DSM Research Fund [CNS2015070B]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To explore the relationship between the erythrocyte fatty acid profile and cognition in elderly Chinese adults. Methods: 60 mild cognitive impairment (MCI) subjects and 60 age- and gender-matched control adults (aged 55 years and above) were involved in this cross-sectional study. Cognitive function was measured by using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test. Information regarding the demographic characteristics and lifestyle of the participants was collected with a questionnaire. A semi-quantified food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) method was used for dietary assessment. The erythrocytes fatty acid profile was measured. Results: The MCI subjects had a lower education level than the control subjects (p < 0.05). Compared with control subjects, MCI subjects had higher daily poultry intake and lower fish intake (p < 0.05). Erythrocyte fatty acid profile of the MCI subjects was characterized as lower erythrocyte proportions of 20: 4 n-6, 20: 5 n-3, and total n-3 fatty acids compared with control subjects (p < 0.05). An association of erythrocyte proportions of 18: 0, 22: 0, total SFA, 18: 2 n-6, 24: 4 n-6 fatty acids, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and total n-6 PUFAs with cognition in elderly Chinese adults was detected. Conclusion: The erythrocyte fatty acid profile was related to cognitionin the elderly. Lower erythrocyte unsaturated fatty acid and higher saturated fatty acid proportions might predict cognitive function decline in elderly Chinese adults.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据