4.7 Article

The Association between the Lipids Levels in Blood and Risk of Age-Related Macular Degeneration

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 8, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu8100663

关键词

age-related macular degeneration; blood lipids levels; HDL; meta-analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC-81202198, NSFC-81473059]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province of China [2013JQ4008]
  3. New-Star Plan of Science and Technology of Shaanxi Province [2015LJXX-07]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Special Foundation [2015T81036]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [qngz2016004]
  6. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M560790]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lipid metabolism may be involved in the pathogenic mechanism of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). However, conflicting results have been reported in the associations of AMD with blood lipids. We performed a meta-analysis including a total of 19 studies to evaluate associations between blood lipids and this disease. The result reported that the high level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) obtained with an increment of 1 mmol/L could result in a significantly increase in the AMD risk of approximately 18% (relative risk (RR), 1.18; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01 to 1.35; I-2 = 53.8%; p = 0.007). High levels of total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and triglycerides (TG) were significantly associated with a decreased risk of AMD (RRs ranging from 0.92 to 0.95; all p < 0.05). The stratified analysis based on AMD subtypes showed that these blood lipids were only significantly associated with the risk of early AMD (all p < 0.05). The association between the blood lipids and AMD risk did not differ substantially based on the other characteristics of the participants. A high HDL-C level was associated with an increased AMD risk, whereas participants with high TC, LDL-C, and TG concentrations may show a decreased risk for this disease. Further well-designed large studies are warranted to confirm the conclusions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据