4.7 Article

Low Prevalence of Vitamin D Insufficiency among Nepalese Infants Despite High Prevalence of Vitamin D Insufficiency among Their Mothers

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 8, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI AG
DOI: 10.3390/nu8120825

关键词

25(OH)D; vitamin D status; season; lactating mothers; infants; Nepal

资金

  1. Norwegian Council of Universities' Committee for Development Research and Education [NUFUSM-2007/10177]
  2. The Research Council of Norway [172226]
  3. GCRieber Funds South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority [2012090]
  4. Innlandet Hospital Trust [150265]
  5. United States Agency for International Development through the Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Nutrition [AID-O-AA-1-1-0005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Describing vitamin D status and its predictors in various populations is important in order to target public health measures. Objectives: To describe the status and predictors of vitamin D status in healthy Nepalese mothers and infants. Methods: 500 randomly selected Nepalese mother and infant pairs were included in a cross-sectional study. Plasma 25(OH) D concentrations were measured by LC-MS/MS and multiple linear regression analyses were used to identify predictors of vitamin D status. Results: Among the infants, the prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency (25(OH) D <50 nmol/L) and deficiency (<30 nmol/L) were 3.6% and 0.6%, respectively, in contrast to 59.8% and 14.0% among their mothers. Infant 25(OH) D concentrations were negatively associated with infant age and positively associated with maternal vitamin D status and body mass index (BMI), explaining 22% of the variability in 25(OH) D concentration. Global solar radiation, maternal age and BMI predicted maternal 25(OH) D concentration, explaining 9.7% of its variability. Conclusion: Age and maternal vitamin D status are the main predictors of vitamin D status in infants in Bhaktapur, Nepal, who have adequate vitamin D status despite poor vitamin D status in their mothers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据