4.8 Article

The potential for land sparing to offset greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture

期刊

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
卷 6, 期 5, 页码 488-492

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NCLIMATE2910

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cambridge Conservation Initiative Collaborative Fund for Conservation
  2. Gates Cambridge Scholarship
  3. BBSRC [BBS/E/C/00005198]
  4. Arcadia
  5. BBSRC [BBS/E/C/00005194, BBS/E/C/00005189, BB/J011371/1, BBS/E/C/00005196, BB/N004345/1, BB/M007693/1, BBS/E/C/00005198] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. NERC [NE/M021327/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/C/00005198, BB/M007693/1, BB/N004345/1, BB/J011371/1, 1344055, BBS/E/C/00005194] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/M021327/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Greenhouse gas emissions from global agriculture are increasing at around 1% per annum, yet substantial cuts in emissions are needed across all sectors(1). The challenge of reducing agricultural emissions is particularly acute, because the reductions achievable by changing farming practices are limited(2,3) and are hampered by rapidly rising food demand(4,5). Here we assess the technical mitigation potential offered by land sparing-increasing agricultural yields, reducing farmland area and actively restoring natural habitats on the land spared(6). Restored habitats can sequester carbon and can offset emissions from agriculture. Using the UK as an example, we estimate net emissions in 2050 under a range of future agricultural scenarios. We find that a land-sparing strategy has the technical potential to achieve significant reductions in net emissions from agriculture and land-use change. Coupling land sparing with demand-side strategies to reduce meat consumption and food waste can further increase the technical mitigation potential-however, economic and implementation considerations might limit the degree to which this technical potential could be realized in practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据