4.8 Article

Increasing beef production could lower greenhouse gas emissions in Brazil if decoupled from deforestation

期刊

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
卷 6, 期 5, 页码 493-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NCLIMATE2916

关键词

-

资金

  1. EU [266018]
  2. CAPES Foundation [10180/13-3]
  3. Scottish Government Rural and Environmental Science and Analytical Services division through ClimatexChange
  4. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/N013255/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. ESRC [ES/N013255/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent debate about agricultural greenhouse gas emissions mitigation highlights trade-offs inherent in the way we produce and consume food, with increasing scrutiny on emissions intensive livestock products(1-3). Although most research has focused on mitigation through improved productivity(4,5), systemic interactions resulting from reduced beef production at the regional level are still unexplored. A detailed optimization model of beef production encompassing pasture degradation and recovery processes, animal and deforestation emissions, soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics and upstream life-cycle inventory was developed and parameterized for the Brazilian Cerrado. Economic return was maximized considering two alternative scenarios: decoupled livestock-deforestation (DID), assuming baseline deforestation rates controlled by effective policy; and coupled livestock-deforestation (CLD), where shifting beef demand alters deforestation rates. In DID, reduced consumption actually leads to less productive beef systems, associated with higher emissions intensities and total emissions, whereas increased production leads to more efficient systems with boosted SOC stocks, reducing both per kilogram and total emissions. Under CLD, increased production leads to 60% higher emissions than in DLD. The results indicate the extent to which deforestation control contributes to sustainable intensification in Cerrado beef systems, and how alternative life-cycle analytical approaches result in significantly different emission estimates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据