4.4 Article

Examining factors associated with self-management skills in teenage survivors of cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 686-691

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11764-016-0514-y

关键词

Self-management skills; Childhood cancer survivors; Transition

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research Institute of Cancer Research
  2. Innovation Fund of the Hamilton Academic Health Sciences Organization Alternate Funding Plan under Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care
  3. Ontario Medical Association
  4. Canadian Institutes of Health Research Mid-Career Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Monitoring long-term health of teenage cancer survivors is dependent on successful transition from pediatric to adult long-term follow-up (LTFU) care. This study identified factors associated with self-management skills (SMSs), an important correlate of successful transition. Data were collected from a cross-sectional survey conducted at three Canadian hospitals between July 2011 and January 2012. The sample included 184 childhood cancer survivors aged between 15 and 19 years. Independent factors included demographic- and illness-related factors. The outcome of interest was SMSs, measured using the SMSs scale, with higher scores indicating more SMSs. More SMSs were associated positively with older age (beta = 1.2, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 0.1 to 2.4), being female (beta = 4.6, 95 % CI = 1.9 to 7.4), and having a non-married parent (beta = 5.2, 95 % CI = 0.04 to 10.4). There was a negative association between SMSs and having had a central nervous system tumor (CNS) compared to having leukemia (beta = -7.9, 95 % CI = -13.5 to -2.2). Younger, male, and CNS tumor survivors lack SMSs. Future research is needed to explore the extent and nature of associations between SMSs and parents' marital status. Younger, male, and CNS tumor survivors should be targeted for interventions in order to ensure that adequate SMSs are attained before completion of transition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据