4.6 Article

18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT for the Detection of Prostate Cancer Relapse A Comparison to 11C-Choline PET/CT

期刊

CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE
卷 40, 期 8, 页码 E386-E391

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000849

关键词

-

资金

  1. Programma di Ricerca Regione, Universita della Regione Emilia Romagna-Bando Giovani Ricercatori

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose In recent years, a new PET compound (anti-3-F-18-FACBC or F-18-fluciclovine) was tested for the detection of prostate cancer relapse. Despite very promising results, only preliminary data were available with regard to the comparison to C-11-choline. The aim of this study was to compare the detection rate of F-18-FACBC and C-11-choline in patients presenting a biochemical relapse. Patients and Methods Fifty patients radically treated for prostate cancer and presenting with rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were consecutively and prospectively enrolled. All the patients were out of hormonal therapy and underwent both C-11-choline PET/CT and F-18-fluciclovine PET/CT within 1 week. The results were compared in terms of detection rate on a patient and lesion basis. Furthermore, a more detailed analysis regarding local, lymph node, and bone relapse was performed. Results On a patient-based analysis, F-18-fluciclovine detection turned out to be significantly superior to C-11-choline (P < 0.000001). This result was also true on lesion, lymph node, bone lesion, and local relapse analysis (P < 0.0001 in all the cases). There was no significant difference in terms of target to background of positive lesions between C-11-choline and F-18-fluciclovine. When the patients were divided into groups with different PSA levels, F-18-fluciclovine had a superior detection rate for low, intermediate, and high PSA levels. Conclusions In our experimental conditions, F-18-fluciclovine provided a statistically significant better performance in terms of lesion detection rate as compared with C-11-choline. However, more studies are required to evaluate the clinical significance of these results in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据