4.6 Article

Anterior cingulate activity to monetary loss and basal ganglia activity to monetary gain uniquely contribute to the feedback negativity

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 126, 期 7, 页码 1338-1347

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.08.025

关键词

ERP; Feedback negativity; Reward; ACC; Striatum; Depression

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [K08-MH08023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The feedback negativity (FN) is an event-related potential that differentiates unfavorable versus favorable outcomes. Although thought to reflect error-related activity within the anterior cingulate cortex, recent work indicates the FN may also reflect reward-related activity that has been linked to the basal ganglia. To date, it remains unclear how to reconcile these conflicting perspectives. Methods: We decomposed the FN by applying time-frequency analysis to isolate activity unique to monetary losses and gains. The FN was recorded from 84 individuals during a laboratory gambling task. Results: Two signals contributed to the FN elicited by unpredictable outcomes: theta activity (4-7 Hz) was increased following monetary loss, and delta activity (<3 Hz) was increased following monetary gain. Predictable outcomes elicited delta but not theta activity. Source analysis revealed distinct generators, with loss-related theta localized to the anterior cingulate cortex and gain-related delta to a possible source in the striatum. Symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress reactivity were specifically associated with blunted gain-related delta. Conclusions: The FN may be a composite of loss-and gain-related neural activity, reflecting distinct facets of reward processing. Significance: Gain-related delta activity may provide unique information about reward dysfunction in major depression and other internalizing psychopathology. (C) 2014 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据