4.3 Article

Smoothing data association for target trajectory estimation in cluttered environments

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s13634-016-0321-7

关键词

Smoothing data association; FLIPDA-S; False track discrimination; Target existence

资金

  1. Agency for Defense Development, Korea [UD130015DD]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For heavily cluttered environments with low target detection probabilities, tracking filters may fail to estimate the true number of targets and their trajectories. Smoothing may be needed to refine the estimates based on collected measurements. However, due to uncertainties in target motions, heavy clutter, and low target detection probabilities, the forward prediction and the backward prediction may not be properly matched in the smoothing algorithms, so that the smoothing algorithms may fail to detect the true target trajectories. In this paper, we propose a new smoothing algorithm to overcome such difficulties. This algorithm employs two independent integrated probabilistic data association (IPDA) tracking filters: one running forward in time (fIPDA) and the other running backward in time (bIPDA). The proposed algorithm utilizes bIPDA multi-tracks in each fIPDA path track for fusing through data association to obtain the smoothing innovation in a fixed-lag interval. The smoothing innovation is used to obtain the smoothing data association probabilities which update the target trajectory state and the probability of target existence. The fIPDA tracks are updated after smoothing using the smoothing data association probabilities, which makes the fIPDA path tracks robust for maneuvering target tracking in clutter. This significantly improves the target state estimation accuracy compared to the IPDA. The proposed algorithm is called fixed-lag smoothing data association based on IPDA (FLIPDA-S). A simulation study shows that the proposed algorithm improves false track discrimination performance for maneuvering target tracking in clutter.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据