4.6 Article

A method for optimizing EEG electrode number and configuration for signal acquisition in P300 speller systems

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 126, 期 6, 页码 1171-1177

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.09.021

关键词

Brain-computer interface; Event-related potential; P300; Speller; Electrode placement; Natural language processing

资金

  1. NIH/NIBIB Medical Imaging Informatics Training Grant [T32 EB016640]
  2. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Award [K23EB014326]
  3. UCLA Scholars in Translational Medicine Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The P300 speller is intended to restore communication to patients with advanced neuromuscular disorders, but clinical implementation may be hindered by several factors, including system setup, burden, and cost. Our goal was to develop a method that can overcome these barriers by optimizing EEG electrode number and placement for P300 studies within a population of subjects. Methods: A Gibbs sampling method was developed to find the optimal electrode configuration given a set of P300 speller data. The method was tested on a set of data from 15 healthy subjects using an established 32-electrode pattern. Resulting electrode configurations were then validated using online prospective testing with a naive Bayes classifier in 15 additional healthy subjects. Results: The method yielded a set of four posterior electrodes (PO8, PO7, POZ, CPZ), which produced results that are likely sufficient to be clinically effective. In online prospective validation testing, no significant difference was found between subjects' performances using the reduced and the full electrode configurations. Conclusions: The proposed method can find reduced sets of electrodes within a subject population without reducing performance. Significance: Reducing the number of channels may reduce costs, set-up time, signal bandwidth, and computation requirements for practical online P300 speller implementation. (C) 2014 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据