4.2 Review

Tenofovir-based oral preexposure prophylaxis prevents HIV infection among women

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN HIV AND AIDS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 18-26

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000207

关键词

adherence; effectiveness; efficacy; HIV prevention; preexposure prophylaxis; women

资金

  1. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [R00HD076679] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH095507] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NICHD NIH HHS [R00 HD076679] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH095507] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of reviewDespite tremendous promise as a female-controlled HIV prevention strategy, implementation of preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among women has been limited, in part because of disparate efficacy results from randomized trials in this population. This review synthesizes existing evidence regarding PrEP efficacy for preventing HIV infection in women and considerations for delivering PrEP to women.Recent findingsIn three efficacy trials, conducted among men and women, tenofovir-based oral PrEP reduced HIV acquisition in subgroups of women by 49-79% in intent-to-treat analyses, and by >85% when accounting for PrEP adherence. Two trials did not demonstrate an HIV prevention benefit from PrEP in women, but substantial evidence indicates those results were compromised by very low adherence to the study medication. Qualitative research has identified risk perception, stigma, and aspects of clinical trial participation as influencing adherence to study medication. Pharmacokinetic studies provide supporting evidence that PrEP offers HIV protection in women who are adherent to the medication.SummaryTenofovir-based daily oral PrEP prevents HIV acquisition in women. Offering PrEP as an HIV prevention option for women at high risk of HIV acquisition is a public health imperative and opportunities to evaluate implementation strategies for PrEP for women are needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据