4.3 Article

Polarized CD163+tumor-associated macrophages are associated with increased angiogenesis and CXCL12 expression in gastric cancer

出版社

ELSEVIER MASSON, CORPORATION OFFICE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2015.09.005

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) play a significant role in tumor progression and angiogenesis. However, the prognostic value of TAMs in different histologic locations of gastric cancer (GC) is still unknown. We evaluated the distribution of TAMs in different histologic locations to investigate its importance in predicting prognosis and the relationship with angiogenesis and CXCL12 expression in GC. Methods and materials: The distribution of TAMs and microvessel density (MVD) in 113 GC samples were evaluated by immunohistochemical staining of CD163 and CD105, respectively. The extent of TAM distribution in the tumor was categorized into three groups: infiltrated TAMs in the tumor nest (TN), tumor stroma (TS) and invasive tumor margin (TM). The expression of CXCL12 in GC were evaluated by immunohistochemical staining of tissues from 88 GC samples. Results: The increased CD163+ TAMs in TS and TM were closely correlated with tumor size, depth of invasion, TNM stage, lymph node metastasis, and lymphovascular invasion. TAMs in TN was not related with any clinicopathologic characteristics except histologic differentiation. The high infiltration of CD163+ TAMs in TS and TM were significantly correlated with poor overall survival. Regardless of location, CD163+ TAMs were significantly correlated with increased MVD. CXCL12 expression was significantly associated with increased CD163+ TAMs in TS and TM. Conclusions: TAMs in different histologic locations in GC were related to distinct aspects of tumor progression. CD163+ TAMs in TS and TM are associated with tumor progression and CXCL12 expression in GC. TAMs may be involved in tumor progression through the angiogenesis. (C) 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据