4.6 Article

Bidimensional ZSM-5 zeolites probed as catalysts for polyethylene cracking

期刊

CATALYSIS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 6, 期 8, 页码 2754-2765

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5cy02075a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Czech Science Foundation [P106/12/0189]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lamellar and pillared ZSM-5 zeolites (L-ZSM-5 and PI-ZSM-5, respectively) were synthesized and tested in the catalytic cracking of low-density polyethylene (LDPE). The introduction of silica pillars into lamellar ZSM-5 caused a high increase in the Si/Al ratio (from 33 up to 64) and the generation of uniform mesopores with a size of about 3.5 nm. Both samples provided quite similar LDPE conversions at the three reaction temperatures investigated (340, 360 and 380 degrees C) despite the lower concentration of acid sites in PI-ZSM-5, which is assigned to the improved active centre accessibility due to the pillaring treatment. Significant activity was observed even at the lowest temperature, with LDPE conversions in the range 27-36%, which indicates that 2D ZSM-5 zeolites are convenient catalysts for polyethylene cracking. The main products of LDPE catalytic cracking were C-2-C-5 olefins with a selectivity of 60-70%, denoting that an end-chain cracking mechanism is predominant. 2D ZSM-5 samples were subsequently compared with nanocrystalline (n-ZSM-5) and hierarchical ZSM-5 (h-ZSM-5) zeolites. Pyridine adsorption followed by FTIR measurements showed significant differences in terms of not only acid site concentration but also the Bronsted/Lewis acid distribution among the samples. When the LDPE cracking conversion was referred to the zeolite mesopore/external surface area, a good correlation was observed with the concentration of Bronsted acid sites but not when considering just the Lewis acid sites. This interesting fact suggests that Bronsted acid sites are mainly the active centers for the cracking of the LDPE chains, concluding that in addition to the accessibility, the nature of the acid sites plays a major role in this type of reaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据