4.6 Article

Critical role of interfacial effects on the reactivity of semiconductor-cocatalyst junctions for photocatalytic oxygen evolution from water

期刊

CATALYSIS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 6, 期 18, 页码 6836-6844

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6cy00548a

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of California, Riverside
  2. National Science Foundation [CHE-1301019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photocatalytic water splitting has the potential to provide a sustainable approach for storing the energy of solar photons in the form of chemical bonds. Much work has been executed towards developing semiconducting light absorbers (SC) and co-catalysts (CC) for photoelectrochemical (PEC) and particulate photocatalytic (PPC) water splitting systems. However, minimal insights exist into how the formation of junctions between highly dispersed CC clusters and nanoparticle SCs influences the reactivity of the system, as compared to the reactivity of the CCs in electrochemical environments. In this work, 15 materials consisting of five different CC nanoclusters deposited on three different nanoparticle SCs were synthesized, characterized, and tested for oxygen evolution reaction (OER) activity. The SCs were chosen based on their similar n-type behavior and low OER activity, and the CCs were chosen based on their benchmarked OER reactivity in electrochemical measurements. We found that the photocatalytic activity of these samples for the OER did not directly correlate with the reactivity of the CCs measured under electrochemical conditions. Instead, the performance was controlled by interfacial effects specific to each SC|CC junction. CC electrical conductivity and SC supplied OER overpotential were the major factors identified to strongly affect OER rate. This work suggests that when designing an optimal photocatalyst, one can not simply deposit the most active CC (as measured in electrochemical conditions) on the SC which absorbs the highest fraction of the solar flux, as the CC-SC pairing requires critical interfacial considerations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据