4.6 Article

Hydrodeoxygenation of biodiesel-related fatty acid methyl esters to diesel-range alkanes over zeolite-supported ruthenium catalysts

期刊

CATALYSIS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 6, 期 19, 页码 7239-7251

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6cy01242f

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21472189]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB215304]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [2015A030312007]
  4. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China [2015A010106010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The reaction medium shows a significant effect on the distribution of alkane products for the hydro-deoxygenation of fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) over a bifunctional catalyst. Biodiesel-related methyl stearate was hydrodeoxygenated to heptadecane and octadecane over Ru/HZSM-5. In aqueous medium, heptadecane is a predominant product owing to a suppression effect of water on the octadecanol dehydration process. In the case of cyclohexane medium, the C-17/(C-17 + C-18) ratio significantly decreases with the temperature due to a promotion effect of reaction temperature on the octadecanol hydro-deoxygenation process. Our research results further reveal that solvent water can remarkably promote the methyl stearate-to-stearic acid transformation in the network of hydrodeoxygenation of methyl stearate via hydrolysis and hydrogenolysis steps. The hydrodeoxygenation temperature required for methyl stearate is approximately 40 degrees lower in water than in cyclohexane. The reaction pathway involves methyl stearate hydrogenolysis over Ru/HZSM-5 (in water or organic phase) and methyl stearate hydrolysis over HZSM-5 (in water) to generate stearic acid. Octadecanal is a key intermediate for subsequent stearic acid-to-octadecanol transformation and is responsible for heptadecane production via the decarbonylation pathway over Ru/HZSM-5, while hydrodeoxygenation of octadecanol leads to the formation of octadecane.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据