4.4 Article

Quantitative assessment of visual estimation of the infrared indocyanine green imaging of lymph nodes retrieved at sentinel node navigation surgery for gastric cancer

期刊

BMC SURGERY
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s12893-016-0152-3

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Although the infrared indocyanine green (ICG) imaging is an effective method to identify sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) of gastric cancer, its objectivity has not been verified. Methods: We studied 563 lymph nodes under infrared light observation from the ICG-positive lymphatic basins of 36 patients who underwent SLN-navigated gastrectomy for clinically node-negative gastric cancer. First, the rate of SLN detection, the number of SLNs and sensitivities were compared between ordinary light observation and infrared light observation. Second, 563 lymph nodes were grouped into ICG-positive and - negative under infrared light observation. The intensities of the region of interest for each lymph node defined as the lymph node on which digital imaging was performed using an imaging-software, and the region of reference defined as its surrounding background, were compared and quantified. Results: In the comparison of ordinary light observation with infrared light observation, the SLN identification rates were 28/36 (78 %) vs. 36/36 (100 %), the mean +/- SD (minimum to maximum) number of SLNs was 3.4 +/- 3.7 (0-16) vs. 9.2 +/- 5.9 (2-25), and the sensitivities were 1/5 (20 %) vs. 5/5 (100 %). The ICG-positive group contained 358 lymph nodes with an intensity of 0.323 +/- 1.56 (mean +/- SD), and the ICG-negative group contained 205 lymph nodes with an intensity of 0.639 +/- 1.93 (mean +/- SD), demonstrating a significant difference between these two groups (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: The significant difference in the intensity as measured by an imaging-software between ICG-positive and ICG-negative lymph nodes would erase the concern about the objectivity of the infrared ICG method for SLN-navigated surgery for early gastric cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据