4.8 Article

Triboelectric Nanogenerator for Sustainable Wastewater Treatment via a Self-Powered Electrochemical Process

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 6, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201501778

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21475008, 21275017, 21127007, 21173017, 51272011, 21275102]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-12-0610]
  3. science and technology research projects from the education ministry [213002A]
  4. National Twelfth Five-Year Plan for Science & Technology Support [2013BAK12B06]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51432005, Y4YR011001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By harvesting the flowing kinetic energy of water using a rotating triboelectric nanogenerator (R-TENG), this study demonstrates a self-powered wastewater treatment system that simultaneously removes rhodamine B (RhB) and copper ions through an advanced electrochemical unit. With the electricity generated by R-TENG, the removal efficiency (RE) of RhB can reach the vicinity of 100% within just 15 min when the initial concentration of RhB is around 100 ppm at optimized conditions. The removal efficiency of copper ions can reach 97.3% after 3 h within an initial concentration of 150 ppm at an optimized condition. Importantly, a better performance and higher treating efficiency are found by using the pulsed output of R-TENG than those using direct current (DC) supply for pollutant removal when consuming equal amount of energy. The recovered copper layer on the cathode through R-TENG is much denser, more uniform, and with smaller grain size (d = 20 nm) than those produced by DC process, which also hints at very promising applications of the R-TENG in electroplating industry. In light of the merits such as easy portability, low cost, and effectiveness, this R-TENG-based self-powered electrochemical system holds great potential in wastewater treatment and electroplating industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据